Sign in to your account
Don't have an account?
Sign up to unlock these benefits:
Reset your password
Check your email
Set a new password
Password updated
Email verified
Verification failed
Jackson Kent falls into the Developing category, where predictability hasn’t fully locked in. Younger players show this as they refine their mindset and physical tools. The data can point you in the right direction, but it comes with a wider margin of error.
A Developing profile for Jackson Kent signals that his cycle alignment is still evolving. This is routine for players early in their progression. The ratings can help, but the restricted track record means more swings in outcome.
| Level | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 17.2 | 19 | 15 | 14 | 2 | 15 | 17 | 8.7 | 7.13 | 1.92 | 0.264 | N/A |
| Fair | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15.2 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 6.3 | 2.87 | 1.40 | 0.228 | N/A |
| Suboptimal | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6.0 | 15.00 | 3.00 | 0.500 | N/A |
| Season | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 36.1 | 40 | 25 | 24 | 2 | 25 | 30 | 7.4 | 5.94 | 1.79 | 0.276 | 1.83 |
|
Date
|
Opponent | Decision | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K |
Composite
Score |
Output
Level |
TriSync
Projection |
Game
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2026 | @DET | W | 4.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | Fair | 3.79 | ||
| Sep 15, 2026 | PHI | 5.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | Good | 1.99 | |||
| Sep 4, 2026 | @LAD | L | 5.0 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | Good | 1.71 | ||
| Aug 28, 2026 | MIA | W | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | Fair | 4.22 | ||
| Aug 18, 2026 | @TEX | L | 3.2 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | Good | -0.67 |
Jackson has a Developing profile, meaning his cycle-performance relationship is emerging but hasn’t fully stabilized. This most often applies to younger players who are still maturing physically or establishing consistent routines. The ratings can be useful, but carry more ambiguity, especially with the low amount of games played.