TriSync
Sports
Sports
Sign up for free to continue browsing!
Sign in to your account
Don't have an account?
Sign up to unlock these benefits:
- Current ratings, projections and analysis
- Advanced reports and managerial tools
- Build and save roster of favorite players
Already have an account?
Reset your password
Ready to try again?
Check your email
Ready to try again?
Set a new password
Ready to try again?
Password updated
Email verified
Verification failed
TriSync
Sports Early access period, all features unlocked with free membership. 🔐
Sports Early access period, all features unlocked with free membership. 🔐
Back to Players
Is Marco Gonzales projected to do well today?
#50 Marco Gonzales
Team: Texas Rangers
Position: P
Profile: Aligned
Output Level: Loading...
TriSync Projection: Loading...
📢 TriSync Expert Analysis
ROTO
Start
Possible
With a TriSync Rating greater than or equal to 3.75 and less than 5.55, Gonzales enters a Good window, where solid performance is strongly supported. His Aligned profile bolsters this reliably fractional edge, as his results historically track his cycles with greater accuracy than Variable profiles.
Opposing Pitcher TriSync Projection: 3.60 @ TB
ROTO
Start
Possible
Operating in the Good range (3.75–5.55), Marco projects for unwavering, consistent output. His Aligned profile helps translate that edge into real game results, as his performance tends to follow his cycle more predictably than Variable rivals.
Opposing Pitcher: N/A @ TB
ROTO
Start
Possible
Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)
Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Level | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 35.0 | 34 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 10 | 24 | 6.2 | 2.83 | 1.26 | 0.254 | +33.04% |
| Good | 31 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 162.0 | 169 | 89 | 82 | 34 | 46 | 114 | 6.3 | 4.56 | 1.33 | 0.266 | +2.35% |
| Fair | 29 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 165.0 | 159 | 81 | 72 | 24 | 48 | 99 | 5.4 | 3.93 | 1.25 | 0.254 | +5.16% |
| Suboptimal | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 51.0 | 57 | 28 | 28 | 8 | 19 | 33 | 5.8 | 4.94 | 1.49 | 0.285 | -21.50% |
Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)
| Season | G | W | L | SV | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K | K/9IP | ERA | WHIP | BAA | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6.0 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 0.182 | 4.76 |
| 2024 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33.2 | 43 | 17 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 23 | 6.1 | 4.54 | 1.60 | 0.312 | 2.45 |
| 2023 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 50.0 | 55 | 32 | 29 | 5 | 18 | 34 | 6.1 | 5.22 | 1.46 | 0.282 | 2.34 |
| 2022 | 32 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 183.0 | 194 | 97 | 84 | 30 | 50 | 103 | 5.1 | 4.13 | 1.33 | 0.271 | 2.54 |
| 2021 | 25 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 143.1 | 125 | 64 | 63 | 29 | 42 | 108 | 6.8 | 3.96 | 1.17 | 0.234 | 3.14 |
Individual Game Stats
Click column titles for more information & detailed explanations
|
Date
|
Opponent | Decision | IP | H | R | ER | HR | BB | K |
Composite Score
|
Output Level
|
Game Rating
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | CWS | SV | 3.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | Fair | 4.76 | |
| Aug 7, 2024 | SD | 4.2 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | Fair | -0.23 | ||
| Jul 27, 2024 | @AZ | 2.1 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | Good | -0.50 | ||
| Jul 21, 2024 | PHI | L | 4.2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | Excellent | 3.05 | |
| Jul 12, 2024 | @CWS | W | 5.0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Fair | 4.71 | |
| Apr 13, 2024 | @PHI | 6.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | Suboptimal | 3.02 | ||
| Apr 7, 2024 | BAL | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Good | 3.74 | ||
| Apr 1, 2024 | @WSH | 5.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | Suboptimal | 3.40 | ||
| May 28, 2023 | PIT | 5.2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | Good | 3.96 | ||
| May 23, 2023 | OAK | W | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | Excellent | 4.03 | |
| May 17, 2023 | @BOS | L | 1.2 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Good | -3.48 | |
| May 12, 2023 | @DET | W | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Fair | 3.45 | |
| May 6, 2023 | HOU | 6.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 4 | Fair | 1.90 | ||
| Apr 30, 2023 | @TOR | 3.0 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Fair | -0.52 | ||
| Apr 25, 2023 | @PHI | W | 5.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Good | 4.27 | |
| Apr 19, 2023 | MIL | 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | Good | 5.06 | ||
| Apr 8, 2023 | @CLE | W | 5.2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | Good | 4.40 | |
| Apr 2, 2023 | CLE | 5.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | Fair | 0.36 | ||
| Oct 5, 2022 | DET | 7.0 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | Excellent | 2.36 | ||
| Sep 29, 2022 | TEX | 5.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | Good | 1.44 | ||
| Sep 23, 2022 | @KC | L | 5.0 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Good | 1.71 | |
| Sep 18, 2022 | @LAA | L | 6.1 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | Suboptimal | 0.46 | |
| Sep 11, 2022 | ATL | 6.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | Good | 5.36 | ||
| Sep 5, 2022 | CWS | L | 7.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | Good | 2.64 | |
| Aug 31, 2022 | @DET | W | 6.0 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Suboptimal | 2.03 | |
| Aug 25, 2022 | CLE | W | 6.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | Good | 5.06 | |
| Aug 19, 2022 | @OAK | W | 5.1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Fair | 3.47 | |
| Aug 13, 2022 | @TEX | L | 5.0 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | Fair | -0.04 | |
| Aug 7, 2022 | LAA | W | 6.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | Good | 3.59 | |
| Aug 1, 2022 | @NYY | L | 5.1 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | Good | -0.76 | |
| Jul 27, 2022 | TEX | W | 7.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | Suboptimal | 4.66 | |
| Jul 22, 2022 | HOU | L | 5.2 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | Good | -0.19 | |
| Jul 14, 2022 | @TEX | 6.0 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | Suboptimal | -0.13 | ||
| Jul 7, 2022 | TOR | W | 6.2 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Good | 2.86 | |
| Jul 1, 2022 | OAK | L | 6.0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Good | 2.45 | |
| Jun 26, 2022 | @LAA | L | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | Excellent | 2.88 | |
| Jun 21, 2022 | @OAK | W | 7.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Fair | 3.35 | |
| Jun 15, 2022 | MIN | L | 6.2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | Fair | 3.86 | |
| Jun 10, 2022 | BOS | 4.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | Suboptimal | 2.15 | ||
| Jun 4, 2022 | @TEX | L | 7.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | Good | 3.07 | |
| May 29, 2022 | HOU | L | 7.1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Fair | 3.13 | |
| May 23, 2022 | OAK | W | 5.1 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 3 | Suboptimal | 0.96 | |
| May 18, 2022 | @TOR | W | 6.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | Fair | 3.74 | |
| May 13, 2022 | @NYM | 6.2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | Good | 4.15 | ||
| May 7, 2022 | TB | L | 5.1 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | Fair | 1.50 | |
| May 2, 2022 | @HOU | L | 6.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | Good | 1.35 | |
| Apr 27, 2022 | @TB | L | 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Good | 2.94 | |
| Apr 21, 2022 | TEX | 4.2 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | Fair | 3.62 | ||
| Apr 15, 2022 | HOU | W | 7.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | Fair | 6.17 | |
| Apr 10, 2022 | @MIN | L | 2.0 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | Good | 1.44 | |
| Oct 1, 2021 | LAA | L | 6.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | Fair | 3.74 | |
| Sep 26, 2021 | @LAA | W | 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | Good | 5.11 | |
| Sep 21, 2021 | @OAK | W | 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | Excellent | 3.88 | |
| Sep 15, 2021 | BOS | 6.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | Fair | 3.45 | ||
| Sep 10, 2021 | AZ | W | 6.0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | Good | 3.74 | |
| Sep 4, 2021 | @AZ | W | 5.0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | Fair | 0.36 | |
| Aug 29, 2021 | KC | W | 7.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | Fair | 3.93 | |
| Aug 23, 2021 | @OAK | 6.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | Fair | 2.31 | ||
| Aug 18, 2021 | @TEX | W | 5.1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | Excellent | 5.23 | |
| Aug 12, 2021 | TEX | W | 9.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | Good | 7.51 | |
| Aug 6, 2021 | @NYY | 6.2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | Fair | 5.64 | ||
| Aug 1, 2021 | @TEX | 6.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | Fair | 4.61 | ||
| Jul 25, 2021 | OAK | W | 5.2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | Fair | 3.67 | |
| Jul 20, 2021 | @COL | W | 5.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | Good | 2.83 | |
| Jul 9, 2021 | LAA | 5.2 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | Good | 1.97 | ||
| Jul 3, 2021 | TEX | L | 3.1 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 4 | Good | -1.74 | |
| Jun 20, 2021 | TB | 6.1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | Fair | 3.52 | ||
| Jun 14, 2021 | MIN | 5.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | Suboptimal | 1.99 | ||
| Jun 8, 2021 | @DET | L | 4.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | Good | 0.85 | |
| Jun 1, 2021 | OAK | 4.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | Good | 4.96 | ||
| Apr 27, 2021 | @HOU | L | 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | Fair | 2.88 | |
| Apr 20, 2021 | LAD | L | 7.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | Fair | 5.56 | |
| Apr 15, 2021 | @BAL | W | 5.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | Good | 4.12 | |
| Apr 8, 2021 | @MIN | L | 4.1 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 6 | Fair | -1.19 | |
| Apr 1, 2021 | SF | 6.0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | Fair | -0.52 |
A Good TriSync Rating points to proficient execution rather than extreme game results. With an Aligned profile, Marco's performance is more likely to stay on script, closely matching the expectations of his cycle.
Opposing Pitcher TriSync Projection: 4.05 vs SEA