TriSync
Sports
- "🚧 Beta currently in progress: Everything is free to explore as we refine and expand the platform."
Back to Players

Should I start or sit Peter Lambert today?

Peter Lambert
#38 Peter Lambert
Team: Houston Astros
Position: P
Profile: Aligned
Level:
TriSync Rating:

📢 TriSync Expert Analysis

Lambert's TriSync Rating places him in the Excellent range, highlighting optimal timing for success. Combined with an Aligned profile, his effort tends to mirror these conditions, making high-quality outcomes more consistent than with Variable rivals. When Peter Lambert's TriSync rating tops out, scoring becomes infrequent. A 3.20 ERA in the Excellent span, which leads all performance tiers, makes him a high-upside option worth rostering.

ROTO
Start
Mid Tier

This range points to a controlled, steady level of production. With an Aligned profile, Lambert's historical tendency to follow his cycle adds conviction that this edge will hold.

ROTO
Start
Mid Tier

A Good TriSync Rating points to no-nonsense execution rather than extreme outputs. With an Aligned profile, Peter's effort is more likely to stay on script, closely matching the expectations of his cycle.

ROTO
Start
Mid Tier

Player Performance Cycles (30 Day Interval)

Performance Level Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Level G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating +/- 
Excellent 6 0 1 0 19.2 23 8 7 3 4 16 7.3 3.20 1.37 0.291 +20.07%
Good 25 4 6 0 77.2 74 40 39 9 25 72 8.3 4.52 1.27 0.254 +17.53%
Fair 24 4 7 0 73.1 77 55 52 11 40 58 7.1 6.38 1.60 0.270 -15.44%
Suboptimal 8 1 2 0 29.0 38 19 19 6 11 21 6.5 5.90 1.69 0.317 -23.54%

Season Stats (Last 5 Years & Current)

Season G W L SV IP H R ER HR BB K K/9IP ERA WHIP BAA Game Rating x̄
2026 8 4 4 0 45.1 34 19 19 2 21 43 8.5 3.77 1.21 0.207 3.41
2024 28 2 5 0 61.1 73 42 39 7 29 50 7.3 5.72 1.66 0.302 3.02
2023 25 3 7 0 87.1 93 54 52 18 28 71 7.3 5.36 1.39 0.273 2.84
2021 2 0 0 0 5.2 12 7 7 2 2 3 4.8 11.12 2.47 0.429 0.81

Individual Game Stats

Date Opponent Decision IP H R ER HR BB K TriSync Rating TriSync Level Game Rating
May 30, 2026 MIL W 5.0 5 2 2 0 3 3 1.14 Suboptimal 2.97
May 24, 2026 @CHC W 5.0 5 3 3 0 4 5 3.74 Fair 2.41
May 17, 2026 TEX L 6.0 3 5 5 1 2 6 2.70 Fair 1.48
May 11, 2026 SEA L 7.0 6 3 3 1 1 6 5.12 Good 3.21
May 5, 2026 LAD W 7.0 3 0 0 0 4 4 4.79 Good 5.41
Apr 30, 2026 @BAL L 4.1 2 2 2 0 3 3 2.33 Fair 2.71
Apr 22, 2026 @CLE W 6.0 3 0 0 0 3 8 5.27 Good 6.73
Apr 17, 2026 STL L 5.0 7 4 4 0 1 8 4.98 Good 2.41
Aug 22, 2024 @WSH 2.0 5 3 3 1 2 2 2.76 Fair 1.03
Aug 17, 2024 SD 2.0 5 3 1 1 1 0 3.44 Fair 2.41
Aug 14, 2024 @AZ 2.1 2 1 0 0 2 1 4.09 Good 3.76
Aug 11, 2024 ATL 2.1 2 0 0 0 1 3 1.09 Suboptimal 4.63
Aug 8, 2024 NYM 3.0 5 2 2 1 1 3 1.35 Suboptimal 2.59
Aug 3, 2024 @SD L 1.0 3 2 2 0 0 0 4.22 Good 1.94
Jul 30, 2024 @LAA 2.1 1 0 0 0 0 3 4.72 Good 5.08
Jul 27, 2024 @SF 1.0 1 1 1 0 0 2 5.52 Good 3.64
Jul 24, 2024 BOS 2.0 5 4 4 0 0 2 5.41 Good 0.76
Jul 22, 2024 BOS 0.1 1 0 0 0 0 0 5.28 Good 3.80
Jul 12, 2024 @NYM 3.2 2 1 1 1 2 4 6.71 Excellent 4.01
Jul 9, 2024 @CIN 3.0 3 2 2 0 2 2 1.02 Suboptimal 2.31
Jul 3, 2024 MIL 4.1 2 0 0 0 0 2 6.97 Excellent 5.03
Jun 2, 2024 @LAD 2.2 1 0 0 0 3 3 3.39 Fair 4.25
May 28, 2024 CLE L 2.0 0 1 1 0 1 1 3.67 Fair 3.40
May 23, 2024 @OAK L 0.2 2 1 1 0 2 1 5.02 Good 2.58
May 18, 2024 @SF 2.0 2 1 1 0 2 0 3.11 Fair 2.55
May 15, 2024 @SD 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2.07 Fair 4.08
May 8, 2024 SF L 3.0 9 7 7 1 0 2 3.70 Fair -1.92
May 2, 2024 @MIA 3.1 5 4 4 1 3 3 3.35 Fair 0.46
Apr 25, 2024 SD 2.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.85 Good 4.40
Apr 21, 2024 SEA L 3.0 6 6 6 0 0 5 4.75 Good 0.00
Apr 17, 2024 @PHI 1.2 2 1 1 1 0 2 3.02 Fair 3.62
Apr 12, 2024 @TOR 3.0 1 0 0 0 1 3 4.12 Good 4.91
Apr 8, 2024 AZ W 2.0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4.41 Good 4.86
Apr 5, 2024 TB 2.0 2 0 0 0 1 2 7.05 Excellent 4.27
Apr 1, 2024 @CHC 2.0 5 2 2 0 1 2 1.85 Suboptimal 2.13
Mar 30, 2024 @AZ W 1.0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2.14 Fair 3.93
Sep 10, 2023 @SF L 5.0 8 6 6 3 2 2 1.13 Suboptimal -1.21
Sep 4, 2023 @AZ L 6.0 6 4 4 0 1 5 3.70 Fair 1.90
Aug 29, 2023 ATL L 5.0 9 3 3 1 0 2 6.89 Excellent 1.57
Aug 24, 2023 @TB 5.0 4 2 2 1 1 6 5.00 Good 3.98
Aug 18, 2023 CWS W 7.0 4 1 1 1 1 5 4.44 Good 5.56
Aug 12, 2023 @LAD L 6.0 7 3 3 2 1 4 1.15 Suboptimal 2.31
Aug 7, 2023 @MIL L 3.2 4 5 5 1 3 4 2.29 Fair 0.12
Aug 1, 2023 SD L 4.1 4 4 4 0 2 2 3.61 Fair 0.78
Jul 26, 2023 @WSH 6.0 3 1 0 0 1 2 2.83 Fair 4.91
Jul 21, 2023 @MIA W 5.0 3 0 0 0 1 3 3.59 Fair 5.61
Jul 1, 2023 DET 3.0 2 0 0 0 1 2 3.92 Good 4.47
Jun 29, 2023 LAD 1.0 5 5 5 1 1 0 3.66 Fair -0.99
Jun 23, 2023 LAA 1.0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2.05 Fair 3.93
Jun 20, 2023 @CIN 3.0 5 3 2 1 0 4 5.68 Excellent 3.16
Jun 16, 2023 @ATL 2.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5.19 Good 3.98
Jun 14, 2023 @BOS 1.2 3 1 1 0 1 2 7.42 Excellent 3.19
Jun 9, 2023 SD 3.0 3 2 2 2 0 4 2.36 Fair 3.45
Jun 6, 2023 SF 1.1 3 3 3 0 4 3 2.38 Fair 0.91
May 31, 2023 @AZ 2.2 3 1 1 1 2 3 5.03 Good 3.38
May 28, 2023 NYM W 2.2 3 1 1 1 2 1 3.52 Fair 3.38
May 24, 2023 MIA 2.2 6 5 5 2 0 3 4.87 Good 0.21
May 19, 2023 @TEX 2.2 3 2 2 0 0 2 1.21 Suboptimal 2.81
May 16, 2023 CIN L 2.0 2 2 2 1 1 2 5.32 Good 2.55
May 13, 2023 PHI 3.1 2 0 0 0 0 5 3.45 Fair 5.73
May 10, 2023 @PIT 2.1 0 0 0 0 1 4 4.33 Good 5.23
Sep 29, 2021 WSH 2.0 8 5 5 0 1 1 5.33 Good -0.95
Sep 24, 2021 SF 3.2 4 2 2 2 1 2 3.96 Good 2.58