Sign in to your account
Don't have an account?
Sign up to unlock these benefits:
Reset your password
Check your email
Set a new password
Password updated
Email verified
Verification failed
Ewers falls into the Developing category, where dependability hasn’t fully locked in. Younger players show this as they refine their preparation and physical tools. The data can point you in the right direction, but it comes with a wider margin of error.
vs CLE 9/13 - Opposing Team TriSync Projection: N/A
Quinn Ewers’s Developing status means his performance cycles are still being established. It’s a stage where growth and fluctuation often go hand in hand. The ratings are informative, though less reliable with a restricted number of games.
@ DEN 9/20 - Opposing Team TriSync Projection: N/A
| Level | Games | Comp | Attempts | Comp % | Total Yards | Yards/Game | TDs | TDs/Game | INTs | QB Rating | Sacks | Fumbles | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 1 | 14 | 22 | 63.6% | 172 | 172.0 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 118.0 | 2 | 1 | +45.98% |
| Good | 1 | 5 | 8 | 62.5% | 53 | 53.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 81.8 | 2 | 2 | -61.17% |
| Fair | 1 | 16 | 23 | 69.6% | 137 | 137.0 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 | 81.3 | 4 | 0 | +9.36% |
| Suboptimal | 1 | 20 | 30 | 66.7% | 260 | 260.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 66.0 | 0 | 0 | +5.83% |
| Level | Games | Attempts | Total Yards | Yards/Game | Yards/Carry | TDs | TDs/Game | Fumbles | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5.0 | 1.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | +45.98% |
| Good | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | -61.17% |
| Fair | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | +9.36% |
| Suboptimal | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | +5.83% |
| Level | Games | Receptions | Targets | Total Yards | Yards/Game | Yards/Rec | TDs | TDs/Game | Fumbles | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 1 | 1 | 1 | -6 | -6.0 | -6.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | +45.98% |
| Good | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | -61.17% |
| Fair | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | +9.36% |
| Suboptimal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | +5.83% |
| Level | Games | Kick Returns | Ret Yards | Yards/Ret | Ret TDs | Punt Returns | Ret Yards | Yards/Ret | Ret TDs | Game Rating +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | +45.98% |
| Good | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | -61.17% |
| Fair | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | +9.36% |
| Suboptimal | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | +5.83% |
| Season | Games | Comp | Attempts | Comp % | Total Yards | Yards/Game | TDs | TDs/Game | INTs | QB Rating | Sacks | Fumbles | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4 | 55 | 83 | 66.3% | 622 | 155.5 | 3 | 0.8 | 3 | 85.5 | 8 | 3 | 3.20 |
| Season | Games | Attempts | Total Yards | Yards/Game | Yards/Carry | TDs | TDs/Game | Fumbles | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4 | 8 | 19 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 3.20 |
| Season | Games | Receptions | Targets | Total Yards | Yards/Game | Yards/Rec | TDs | TDs/Game | Fumbles | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4 | 1 | 1 | -6 | -1.5 | -6.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 3.20 |
| Season | Games | Kick Returns | Ret Yards | Yards/Ret | Ret TDs | Punt Returns | Ret Yards | Yards/Ret | Ret TDs | Game Rating x̄ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 3.20 |
|
Date
|
Opponent | Comp | Attempts | Comp % | Yards | TDs | INTs | Fumbles | QB Rating |
Composite Score
|
Output Level
|
Game Rating
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2026 | @NE | 16 | 23 | 69.6% | 137 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 81.2 | Fair | 3.50 | |
| Dec 28, 2025 | TB | 14 | 22 | 63.6% | 172 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 118.0 | Excellent | 4.67 | |
| Dec 21, 2025 | CIN | 20 | 30 | 66.7% | 260 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.0 | Suboptimal | 3.38 | |
| Oct 19, 2025 | @CLE | 5 | 8 | 62.5% | 53 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 81.8 | Good | 1.24 |
|
Date
|
Opponent | Attempts | Yards | Yards/Att | TDs | Fumbles |
Composite Score
|
Output Level
|
Game Rating
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2026 | @NE | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 3.50 | |
| Dec 28, 2025 | TB | 4 | 5 | 1.3 | 0 | 1 | Excellent | 4.67 | |
| Dec 21, 2025 | CIN | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | 0 | Suboptimal | 3.38 | |
| Oct 19, 2025 | @CLE | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | Good | 1.24 |
|
Date
|
Opponent | Rec | Targets | Yards | Yards/Rec | TDs | Fumbles |
Composite Score
|
Output Level
|
Game Rating
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2026 | @NE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | Fair | 3.50 | |
| Dec 28, 2025 | TB | 1 | 1 | -6 | -6.0 | 0 | 1 | Excellent | 4.67 | |
| Dec 21, 2025 | CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | Suboptimal | 3.38 | |
| Oct 19, 2025 | @CLE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | Good | 1.24 |
|
Date
|
Opponent | Kick Ret | Yards | Yards/Ret | Ret TDs | Punt Ret | Yards | Yards/Ret | Ret TDs |
Composite Score
|
Output Level
|
Game Rating
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2026 | @NE | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | Fair | 3.50 | |
| Dec 28, 2025 | TB | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | Excellent | 4.67 | |
| Dec 21, 2025 | CIN | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | Suboptimal | 3.38 | |
| Oct 19, 2025 | @CLE | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | Good | 1.24 |
Quinn falls into the Developing category, where consistency hasn’t fully locked in. Younger players show this as they refine their discipline and physical tools. The data can point you in the right direction, but it comes with a wider margin of error.
vs TB 8/28 - Opposing Team TriSync Projection: N/A